Well on a film camera I only wanted to waste 2 frames to test the 135mm out and the results were good. Average, no bad.Įxcalibur wrote: A galaxy 135mm f3.5 preset might have some potential for some shots as it has fifteen blades.I bought a Zenit E with Helios 44-2 and this Galaxy lens, all for a £1. Sonyrokkor wrote: I used in the 70's a zoom prinz 75-150 with a carena cam. Location: Perù, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me. The worst lens I've ever owned was a Prinz Galaxy 35mm thing, so bad I took it to bits just to see how badly made it was, and it was truly awful. I think Dixons bought lenses on the lowest price, never mind the quality, principle. I have several 35mm wide angles, if you want one cheaply to try out, let me know. I have several 35mm and 135mm lenses, als very different and quite different performance. Last edited by kds315* on Sat 1:48 pm edited 1 time in totalĭixon's was a UK importer of lenses and bought from several makers, so there is no "Prinz Galaxy" maker, it could be from about anywhere (in Japan). Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm Nothing to really write home about.Ĭosmin: I have several 35mm wide angles, if you want one cheaply to try out, let me know. Kds315* wrote: Dixon's was a UK importer of lenses and bought from several makers, so there is no "Prinz Galaxy" maker, it could be from about anywhere (in Japan). Other: Asahi Super Takumar 55 mm f2 (M42) ,Tamron 300mm f5.6 SP, Tamron 500mm f8 SP.ĭSLR: Nikon D700. Soviet Nikon Mount: Zenitar 16mm f2.8, Arsat/arax/photex 85mm T&S f2.8. Richard_D wrote: Had one many years back on my Zenith 12xp - mediocre at best Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8 Another fact not smart to buy lot of cheap one instead of some good ones.This cheap lenses are unsellable if you found they not usable. From a "noname" mark some copy can be good like Vivitar or Porst individual lenses but generally they maximum average lenses and lot worst than cheap Russian or East German lenses at least this is my experience.
#Nikon f90x flickr pro
I would be furious if I bought a pro Canon body the year before they changed the mount.Attila wrote: Some pieces can be good one, but not expect too much. I understand that you can't make features like VR backwards compatible, but there is nothing whatsoever keeping them from leaving the meter on when you stop down the lens.ĭespite this complaint, Nikon is still better than most, I suppose. I can use my lenses on my Nikon F, all the way up to my D700 or D300. I can look through my lens and see the camera metering, and as soon as I stop the lens down, the meter goes blank.Ī large part of why I use Nikon is because they cared enough about their customer base to keep the same lens mount through all these years. All of these bodies allow you to stop down the lens, but Nikon programmed the camera to stop giving metering information as soon as you stop it down. My non-AI lenses mount just fine on my DSLRs. Click to expand.I'm talking about intentionally locking out the meter, not the fact that the lenses will or will not mount.
0 kommentar(er)
